It depends upon the emergency of the situation. If the person will be affected in a negative way, then the family or authoritative figure must be notified. If the activities that this person divulges into is dangerous to him or her self, then someone must be told about that. But there are certain cases where a person is involved is something wrong and the situation isn't any business of yours, in this situation, nothing can be done.
In terms of personal experiences, you don't rat on your friends, only if the person's life was in jeopardy. There is a bond of loyalty between friends and some things ought to be kept in private out of respect for that person's business. Nosing about and telling everyone could only worsen the situation. Eustace Conway, fortunately, does not have to worry about ratting anyone because of his ego is always interrupting the relationships that he tries to build.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Yes, Eustace has trouble maintaining relationships, but I think your comments about him might be a bit dismissive. Despite Eustace's bullheadedness, he does only wish to see positive outcomes in the world.
While Eustace has specific and unwavering ideas (and ideals) about how other people should behave, I think he would be the first person to help someone else in need, even if that "help" came in the form of "ratting that person out" due to illegal or harmful actions. Like you said, "It depends on the emergency of the situation."
Post a Comment